Programming as a social activity

Frank Shearar wrote “I realised tonight something that I’d forgotten. We’re usually so busy knocking out code to fulfil our timebox coomitments that it’s perhaps easy to forget something very important: to have fun. I went to the local Smalltalk user group tonight where Jason Ayers gave a talk on simplicity: do our tools help us make simple…”

By David Ingham from Bury, Lancashire, England (P2204757 Uploaded by oxyman) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (], via Wikimedia Commons

Changing the Primary Key Type in Ruby on Rails Models

Yong Wen Chua wrote “Ruby on Rails (RoR) likes to emphasise the concept of convention over configuration. Therefore, it seeks to minimialise the amount of configuration by resorting to some defaults. These defaults are sometimes not desirable, and RoR does not always make it easy to deviate from these defaults.”

My little Backpressure: Flow Control is magic

Ceri Storey wrote “When we’re designing systems that are designed to be robust against failure, it’s important to know how behaviour at your Integration points (a term borrowed from Michael Nygard’s book Relase It!) impacts the rest of the system. For example, if your database or a remote API is running slowly, then in Synchronous systems, because you…”

Testing the Reactor pattern

Frank Shearar wrote “A good while ago I wrote a SIP stack. Like many network things, a SIP stack needs to keep track of multiple tasks – reading or writing from sockets, asking the user to respond to events, and so on. And so I naïvely added a bunch of threads. And then I spent a few weeks…”

Precise scheduling with RabbitMQ

Ceri Storey wrote “On a project recently, we needed to be able to process jobs asynchronously, but we also needed to be able to specify that they should be run at a certain point in the future. We also needed to be able to implement exponential backoff on failure. We initially tried to integrate Sidekiq, but unfortunately it…”

Assuming there’s a user is sometimes a bad idea

Frank Shearar wrote “Squeak has a very strong (historic) assumption that there’s a(n interactive) user interface. I stumbled across another occurrence of this assumption the other day. Let’s take a look at the problem, and how to fix it.”

The great GC vs reference counting debate

David Ireland wrote “I read a blog post post recently to the effect that GC is too expensive in mobile devices, Steve Jobs was right, reference counting is the way. It’s titled ‘why mobile web apps are slow’. I’m inclined to take issue with this: It’s a long since resolved dispute, and GC won. I don’t want Steve…”