Comments on: Some simple examples of using Erlang’s XPath implementation http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation What happens at LShift Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:14:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha by: tonyg http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation#comment-91080 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:54:03 +0000 http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation#comment-91080 <p>@Sopwith Camel: Good point. XDM is a richer model than Infoset. I'm not sure the cost would be significantly different, but there's certainly an expressivity win. On the other hand, I don't particularly fancy implementing XPath 2.0 :-)</p> @Sopwith Camel: Good point. XDM is a richer model than Infoset. I’m not sure the cost would be significantly different, but there’s certainly an expressivity win. On the other hand, I don’t particularly fancy implementing XPath 2.0 :-)

]]> by: Sopwith Camel http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation#comment-91054 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:14:37 +0000 http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation#comment-91054 <p>Why not expose the message as XDM and avoid the cost and additional transformation of going via XML Infoset?</p> <p>(apologies for being required to use a nom de blog)</p> Why not expose the message as XDM and avoid the cost and additional transformation of going via XML Infoset?

(apologies for being required to use a nom de blog)

]]> by: tonyg http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation#comment-83129 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:47:36 +0000 http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation#comment-83129 <p>We should experiment with adding it to RabbitMQ first, and making sure the design is sound - and once we have a solid, implementation-neutral proposal, we can ask the AMQP working group what they think of the idea. A proven, implemented idea has much greater chance of being accepted.</p> We should experiment with adding it to RabbitMQ first, and making sure the design is sound - and once we have a solid, implementation-neutral proposal, we can ask the AMQP working group what they think of the idea. A proven, implemented idea has much greater chance of being accepted.

]]> by: John Watson http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation#comment-83097 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:22:43 +0000 http://www.lshift.net/blog/2008/01/31/some-simple-examples-of-using-erlangs-xpath-implementation#comment-83097 <p>Tony,</p> <p>What do you think are the chances of getting an XPath routing exchange added to a future version of the AMQP spec? This sort of thing is precisely what I need.</p> Tony,

What do you think are the chances of getting an XPath routing exchange added to a future version of the AMQP spec? This sort of thing is precisely what I need.

]]>