<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squeak and OpenEmbedded</title>
	<link>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded</link>
	<description>What happens at LShift</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tonyg</title>
		<link>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-118690</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-118690</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Groovy. Let me know how you get on. I have been disappointed by the quality of recent FSO builds (using MokoMakefile) -- my GTA01 reports many, many missing shared libraries in the root image. Very frustrating. YMMV.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groovy. Let me know how you get on. I have been disappointed by the quality of recent FSO builds (using MokoMakefile) &#8212; my GTA01 reports many, many missing shared libraries in the root image. Very frustrating. YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-118565</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-118565</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tony,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the long delay.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FYI, I have my Freerunner and will try to get started on this project.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,</p>
<p>Sorry for the long delay.</p>
<p>FYI, I have my Freerunner and will try to get started on this project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tonyg</title>
		<link>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-98249</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 07:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-98249</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Michael, yes, it should in principle, but it might require a bit of work to bring it back up-to-date with the rapidly-moving OpenEmbedded source tree.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, yes, it should in principle, but it might require a bit of work to bring it back up-to-date with the rapidly-moving OpenEmbedded source tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-98176</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-98176</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have been working on a squeak-based tablet computer project and want to allow for portability to/from Freerunner.  So many thanks for your work.
 Is it likely your squeak port onto the Neo1973 will work on the Freerunner?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have been working on a squeak-based tablet computer project and want to allow for portability to/from Freerunner.  So many thanks for your work.<br />
 Is it likely your squeak port onto the Neo1973 will work on the Freerunner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tonyg</title>
		<link>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-65984</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-65984</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Update: I've added an issue to OpenEmbedded's bug tracker, to see if they would like to fold my build scripts into the main trunk. You can follow the discussion here: &lt;a href="http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3013" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's a &lt;a href="http://bugs.openembedded.org/attachment.cgi?id=2533" rel="nofollow"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to the squeak-x bitbake scripts, for those who would like to try it out in the meantime.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: I&#8217;ve added an issue to OpenEmbedded&#8217;s bug tracker, to see if they would like to fold my build scripts into the main trunk. You can follow the discussion here: <a href="http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3013" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3013</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://bugs.openembedded.org/attachment.cgi?id=2533" rel="nofollow">link</a> to the squeak-x bitbake scripts, for those who would like to try it out in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lothar</title>
		<link>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-65020</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lshift.net/blog/2007/08/23/squeak-and-openembedded#comment-65020</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, 
your squeak port to the Neo1973 is really cool. I'm curious about the ongoing of your project..this sounds like a great plattform.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please post any news on the squeak mailing-lists (like you did ;-) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;cheers,
Lothar&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
your squeak port to the Neo1973 is really cool. I&#8217;m curious about the ongoing of your project..this sounds like a great plattform.</p>
<p>Please post any news on the squeak mailing-lists (like you did ;-) </p>
<p>cheers,<br />
Lothar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
